Europe was once a club of liberal democracies. Not any longer!

Following the expansion of EU over the last seventy years, this infographic depicts the evolution, and relative decline, of Europe’s post-war liberal democratic rule. Back in the 1950s, and for three decades thereafter, all member states had solid liberal democratic governments. The Union was in fact meant to be an exclusive club of liberal democracies. But things did not turn exactly that way. Already by the 1980s, populism, an amalgam of democracy and illiberalism (hence, minimally defined as democratic illiberalism), won power in Greece and then flourished elsewhere, particularly in the southern and eastern parts of the continent. During and after the 1990s, nativist parties—those standing in opposition to migration, further European integration, and globalization—grew strong in most developed countries in western and northern Europe. Meanwhile in Eastern Europe—because of national and ethnic divisions, persisting state corruption, or both—most countries have failed to this date to produce solid and durable liberal democratic governments; instead, as shown by the four CEE countries included herein, most governments in this region stand today as exemplars of democratic illiberalism.

Continue reading “Europe was once a club of liberal democracies. Not any longer!”

A Typology of Parties in Contemporary Europe, 1990-2020

This infographic presents an original typology of political parties in contemporary Europe during the last three decades. It differentiates between seven clearly defined types of parties that are exclusive to each other while collectively including all currently significant parties. The seven party types are: Liberal, populist, nativist, nationalist, regionalist, secessionist, and antidemocratic. The infographic is interactive. If downloaded, you may click on the party acronyms and visit their respective official web pages for more information. Enjoy your exploration to Europe’s ever-changing party and party system landscapes; get your concepts and definitions right; learn how to differentiate populist from non-populist parties (in a per genus et differentiam way); puzzle out how governments are formed; and get a hands-on understanding of your own about the dynamics currently developing, as well as the directions European liberal politics is likely to take in the future.


To download the full infographic, interact with it, and even print it in high-quality and professional form, click on the button below.

Continue reading “A Typology of Parties in Contemporary Europe, 1990-2020”

How to defeat populism – I

Beginning with this article, originally published in October 2018 in the European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog in LSE, I am presenting  a mini-series of four short posts about how populism can be defeated at the polls. As this first piece indicates, it all starts with the availability of a liberal-minded leader with a realistic political and policy plan. Which, alas, is far from easy to get. It is also far from enough. For, as the second, third, and fourth posts in this series show, that leader must also be in control of a political party, present a coherent policy agenda, and use a moderate discourse that is respectful to the institutions of liberal democracy. To empirically demonstrate the points made, I will use the recent defeat of Greece’s populist SYRIZA by the liberal ND party led by Mitsotakis. This case offers valuable lessons for other countries in which populism is in power, particularly the United States.

1/4 LIBERAL LEADER AVAILABILITY

Democracy is undergoing a deep crisis. A number of nominal democracies have slid towards autocracy, most notably Russia, Turkey and Venezuela. Maverick politicians, like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán or Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines, disdain liberal institutional norms and are actively seeking to overthrow them. In the United States, Donald Trump’s presidency is playing havoc with erstwhile sacrosanct traditions and rules of state administration.

Continue reading “How to defeat populism – I”

Right populism versus left populism

A longish read about (1) the differences between right populism and left populism and (2) the disturbing realization that left populism is in most respects similar to its right-wing populist cousin.

Here’s a little quiz: Pick a right populist party and a left populist party of your choice and try to compare them in your mind. Now ask yourself: Are those parties most different because of their right-left distinction or are they most similar because of their populism? For, if they are most different, their “populism” becomes virtually irrelevant and we should center on the time-honored ideological differences between right and left parties. We should also expect such ideologically opposite parties to be politically incompatible. But if the parties you have chosen are deemed to have more similarities than differences, we should disregard ideology and focus instead on what is “populist” about them. We may then discover that their populism is the one element that glues them together. Since the issue here is more than a mere logical quandary, it is worth pursuing it further. Continue reading “Right populism versus left populism”

Follow by Email
Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
LinkedIn
Share
Instagram