I, the People

When I was still a full-time academic, I wrote an article titled “Populists in Power,” which was published in the Journal of Democracy in April 2019. At around the same time, my book entitled Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis also came out by Oxford UP. In both works, I painstakingly analyzed in comparative perspective the most important cases of populist parties/leaders that have enjoyed power in their respective countries. Those countries are, in order of chronological appearance of the populist forces, Argentina, Italy, Venezuela, Hungary, Greece, and the United States. Based on that academic analysis, and aided by a fantastic cartoonist, I decided to condense everything in a very short comic story, combining fictional and real characters. As you will notice (but also see References below), most of the dialogues are direct quotations from speeches or other public utterances by well-known populist leaders. If you enjoyed this blog, you may also want to browse through this slide show.

Continue reading “I, the People”

Democracy, Liberalism, and their Opposites

First published in Democracy Paradox, December 15, 2022

Describing Political Systems

Say you want to construct an all-encompassing typology of political systems in the world. Now, since most knowledge is mediated by words, you had better start with establishing a clear vocabulary. Fine, but you are already stumbling upon the unclear and confusing terms used by such well-respected sources as the V-Dem Institute, the Economist Intelligence UnitFreedom House, or in the academe. Here is a sampling of such terms: “flawed democracy” (as if there are democracies that are “flawless”), “electoral democracy” (as if there are democracies without elections), “hybrid regime”, “competitive authoritarianism” or “partly free regime” (as if there are democracies that are half-democratic and half-nondemocratic), and more. Is there a way of avoiding this terminological and notional hullaballoo?

Yes, there is! In fact, only two terms, and their opposites, should suffice to classify all political systems into a small number of categories that are mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive. This thinking yields two pairs of terms. The first pair includes democracy and its opposite, non-democracy; the second pair consists of liberalism and its own opposite, illiberalism. The next step is to define those terms.

Continue readingDemocracy, Liberalism, and their Opposites

Η δημοκρατική φιλελεύθερη Δύση και οι ΗΠΑ

Δημοσιεύτηκε στην Καθημερινή της Κυριακής, 30 Οκτωβρίου 2022

Υπήρξε μια εποχή, όχι πολύ παλιά, που, έστω στιγμιαία, πιστέψαμε στον ιστορικό θρίαμβο της φιλελεύθερης δημοκρατικής Δύσης απέναντι σε έναν άλλο κόσμο που τον αποτελούσαν μη δημοκρατικές, μη φιλελεύθερες και μη δυτικές κοινωνίες. Λάθος! Πλέον διαπιστώνουμε, όχι δίχως μια γερή δόση φόβου, την αύξηση του αριθμού των χωρών που κυβερνώνται από αυταρχικά καθεστώτα, την αποδυνάμωση των αρχών του φιλελευθερισμού ακόμη και σε χώρες με σημαντική παράδοση σε αυτόν, καθώς και την ολοένα και πιο φανερή τάση ισχυρών μη δυτικών χωρών να συμμαχούν μεταξύ τους με διάφορους τρόπους ενάντια στον δυτικό κόσμο.

Continue reading “Η δημοκρατική φιλελεύθερη Δύση και οι ΗΠΑ”

Anti-systemic Far Right or Systemic Nativism?

Originally published as an op-ed in the Sunday edition of Greek newspaper Kathimerini, Sunday 25 September 2022. Own translation.

Of all the national elections held this year in Europe, three parties, from three countries, garnered the most international attention. In France, Marine Le Pen’s National Rally received over 40% of the vote in the second round of the presidential election held in April. They hope to go beyond and win the next election. In Sweden, the fledgling Sweden Democrats party finished second, having quadrupled its electoral strength in a decade. In Italy, where the polls open today, the also young Brothers of Italy party is expected to come in first and its leader to become prime minister.

Continue reading “Anti-systemic Far Right or Systemic Nativism?”

Italy, Europe’s political laboratory

Originally published as an op-ed in Greek newspaper Kathimerini, 30 August 2022.

History often plays strange games. Take Italy, for example. Exactly one hundred years after Mussolini’s March on Rome, the so-called Brothers of Italy – a new party with roots in postwar fascism – look set to be the winner of the Italian elections to be held on September 25. In that case, the Brothers will almost certainly form a government with the right-wing parties of Matteo Salvini and Silvio Berlusconi. Italy will not suddenly turn fascist, of course. It will however continue to both flounder about in conditions of political instability and fret about its dire economic prospects.

Continue reading “Italy, Europe’s political laboratory”

Ιταλία, πολιτικό εργαστήριο της Ευρώπης

Δημοσιεύτηκε στην Καθημερινή της Κυριακής 31 Αυγούστου 2022

Η ιστορία παίζει παράξενα παιχνίδια. Δείτε την Ιταλία. Aκριβώς εκατό χρόνια μετά την περίφημη “πορεία προς τη Ρώμη” του Μουσολίνι, ένα νεότερο κόμμα με ρίζες στον μεταπολεμικό φασισμό, οι λεγόμενοι Αδελφοί Ιταλοί, φαίνεται ότι θα είναι ο νικητής των ιταλικών εκλογών που θα γίνουν στις 25 Σεπτεμβρίου. Στη συνέχεια, είναι σχεδόν βέβαιο ότι οι Αδελφοί θα σχηματίσουν κυβέρνηση με τα επίσης δεξιά κόμματα των Ματέο Σαλβίνι και Σίλβιο Μπερλουσκόνι. Βέβαια, η Ιταλία δεν θα γίνει ξάφνου φασιστική. Θα συνεχίσει ωστόσο να παραδέρνει σε συνθήκες πολιτικής αστάθειας, ατενίζοντας το πολιτικό της μέλλον με τεράστια αβεβαιότητα και ελάχιστη αισιοδοξία.

Continue reading “Ιταλία, πολιτικό εργαστήριο της Ευρώπης”

“Hybrid regimes” is a bad concept

In this blog, I have written several posts on concepts and shown how good concepts work and how bad concepts don’t, often creating such monstrosities as that strange animal, the cat-dog. In this post, I engage once again with bad concepts, now focusing on “hybrid regimes”, a term used by the Economist Intelligence Unit in a way that only creates confusion.

The world of politics is complex, everyone knows that. To make sense of such complexity, we must begin from having solid concepts, and use them as the basic units of our thinking. A concept consists of three parts: a term (or word, or label) that corresponds to some specific meaning that we have in mind, which in turn points to clearly identifiable empirical referents, that is, the phenomena that we observe out there and want to understand and explain.

Continue reading ““Hybrid regimes” is a bad concept”

Η δημοκρατία σταμάτησε στα σύνορα της Ευρώπης

Δημοσιεύτηκε στην Καθημερινή της Κυριακής, 29 Μαΐου 2022

Πόσο ελκυστική είναι σήμερα η ιδέα της δημοκρατίας πέρα από τα σύνορα της Ευρώπης και πόσο εφαρμόσιμη είναι η ίδια η δημοκρατία στις χώρες που γειτονεύουν με αυτήν; Για πολλούς ευρωπαίους, ακόμη και η σκέψη ότι η δημοκρατία θα μπορούσε να μην αποτελεί επιθυμητό αγαθό των κοινωνιών είναι σχεδόν αδιανόητη. Η πραγματικότητα όμως λέει μια διαφορετική ιστορία—την ιστορία μιας Ευρώπης που διαπιστώνει ότι η εξαγωγή στην ίδια τη γειτονιά της του πολυτιμότερου πολιτικού προϊόντος που διαθέτει, δηλαδή της δημοκρατίας, δεν έχει μεγάλη ζήτηση.

Continue reading “Η δημοκρατία σταμάτησε στα σύνορα της Ευρώπης”

Populism as democratic illiberalism (and how it fits political systems theory)

The following is the text of a keynote address I gave at the 7th Prague Populism Conference on May 16, 2022, in Prague, Czech Republic. To my knowledge, this is the first attempt to locate populism within a parsimonious general theory of political systems across time and space. The analysis is based on years of conceptual, theoretical, and comparative empirical research, originally encapsulated in this infographic.

I am happy to be once again in this Prague conference on populism, which by the years has become one of the most important in Europe on the subject. As this is not my first time to participate in this event, I recall some extraordinary thinkers who in previous years shared important ideas about populism in this room. I am humbled. For my more modest part, what I am going to try today to say something that is original, since I have never presented it before, and which I hope, will also appeal to your own interests on the subject of populism. So, the title of my presentation today is “Populism as democratic illiberalism” and my more particular focus will be on how this populism fits a general political systems theory. Ultimately, I am going to present a typology of the universe of political systems in which populism will take its own specific place. Let us then begin from the source of all contention, which is the concept of “populism.”

Continue reading “Populism as democratic illiberalism (and how it fits political systems theory)”

Political Systems: A Typology

A political system is a particular way is which a polity, or state, is organized and governed. Political systems are distinguished by the different ways they allocate political authority in the interactions that take place within them between the state itself, organized groups in society, and each citizen individually. This infographic presents a typology of all modern political systems, including populism, classified into clearly defined types that are mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive. It also offers minimal definitions for each type of political system. In May 2022, I presented this typology in a conference on populism in Prague, Czechia, and, if interested, you can read my keynote speech here.


Follow by Email
Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
LinkedIn
Share
Instagram